Implementation Implementing JURASIC-Based Academic Supervision at SDN 1 Cilumber, West Bandung Regency
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31538/ndhq.v11i2.399Keywords:
Academic Supervision, Jurassic-Based Supervision, Teacher ProfessionalismAbstract
Academic supervision is an important strategy for improving instructional quality and teacher professionalism in elementary schools. However, supervision practices often remain administrative and provide limited opportunities for reflective learning and professional growth. This study aimed to analyse the implementation of JURASIC-based academic supervision through reflective journaling and dialogic coaching at SDN 1 Cilumber, West Bandung Regency. A qualitative approach with an intrinsic case study design was employed. Participants included the principal and teachers involved in the JURASIC supervision program. Data were collected through in-depth interviews, classroom observations, reflective journals, and supervision documents, and were analysed using data reduction, data display, and conclusion drawing techniques, supported by source and method triangulation. The findings revealed that JURASIC-based supervision enhanced teachers’ reflective awareness, pedagogical competence, instructional planning, and classroom practices. Reflective journaling encouraged teachers to critically evaluate their teaching experiences and identify improvement strategies, while dialogic coaching facilitated constructive feedback, reflective dialogue, and collaborative problem-solving. In addition, the program contributed to the development of a collaborative professional learning culture within the school. Several challenges were identified, including limited supervision time, differences in teachers’ reflective writing abilities, and the need for consistent follow-up activities. The study concludes that integrating reflective journaling and coaching into academic supervision provides a contextual, reflective, and collaborative approach to strengthening teacher professionalism. Therefore, schools are encouraged to institutionalise reflective and coaching-based supervision as part of sustainable professional development programs
References
Admiraal, W., Schenke, W., De Jong, L., Emmelot, Y., & Sligte, H. (2021). Schools as professional learning communities: What can schools do to support professional development of their teachers? Professional Development in Education, 47(4), 684–698. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2019.1665573
Aguilar, E. (2003). The Art of Coaching Audio Book pdf. (November 1998), 1–20.
Aprilianto, A., Majid, M. A. A., & Kartiko, A. (2025). Head Role School As Inner Motivator Improving Teacher Performance. Create: Journal of Islamic Management and Business, 1(1), 13–24.
Avalos, B. (2011). Teacher professional development in Teaching and Teacher Education over ten years. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27(1), 10–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2010.08.007
Barber, J. D. (2021). Using course journals to encourage reflective practice in second language teacher education. Reflective Practice, 22(1), 128–141. https://doi.org/10.1080/14623943.2020.1851670
Barokah, A. I., Yuliana, L., & Raharja, S. (2025). Developing a community-based academic supervision model: A strategic reform for enhancing professional learning in Indonesian primary schools. European Journal of Sustainable Development Research, 9(4). https://doi.org/10.29333/ejosdr/16862
Biesta, G., Priestley, M., & Robinson, S. (2015). The role of beliefs in teacher agency. Teachers and Teaching, 21(6), 624–640. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2015.1044325
Busetto, L., Wick, W., & Gumbinger, C. (2020). How to use and assess qualitative research methods. Neurological Research and Practice, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s42466-020-00059-z
Bush, T., & Ng, A. (2019). Distributed leadership and the Malaysia Education Blueprint: From prescription to partial school-based enactment in a highly centralised context. Journal of Educational Administration. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEA-11-2018-0206
Chien, C.-W. (2013). Analysis of a language teacher’s journal of classroom practice as reflective practice. Reflective Practice, 14(1), 131–143. https://doi.org/10.1080/14623943.2012.732951
Cordingley, P., Higgins, S., Greany, T., Buckler, N., Coles-Jordan, D., Crisp, B., Saunders, L., & Coe, R. (2021). Great teaching. In Developing Great Teaching Lessons from the international reviews into effective professional development. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003132783-4
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2016). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches. SAGE Publications.
Darling-hammond, L., Hyler, M. E., & Gardner, M. (2017). Efective Teacher Professional Development. (June).
Darling-Hammond, L., Hyler, M. E., & Gardner, M. (2017). “Teacher Education Around the World: What Can We Learn from International Practice?” European Journal of Teacher Education 40 (3): 291–309. Doi: 10.1080/02619768.2017.1315399. (June).
De Jong, L., Meirink, J., & Admiraal, W. (2022). Teacher learning in the context of teacher collaboration: Connecting teacher dialogue to teacher learning. Research Papers in Education, 37(6), 1165–1188. https://doi.org/10.1080/02671522.2021.1931950
Dufour, R., Fullan, M., & Dufour, R. (2014). Michael Fullan , PhD The Challenge of Cultural Change. (September).
Dyment, J. E., & O’Connell, T. S. (2011). Assessing the quality of reflection in student journals: A review of the research. Teaching in Higher Education, 16(1), 81–97. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2010.507308
Edmonson, A. C. (2025). Psychological Safety. Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion in Veterinary Medicine, 171–180. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781394217113.ch16
Farrell, T. S. C., & Macapinlac, M. (2021). Professional Development Through Reflective Practice: A Framework for TESOL Teachers. Canadian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 24(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.37213/cjal.2021.28999
Glickman, C. D., Gordon, S. P., & Ross-Gordon, J. M. (2017). SuperVision and Instructional Leadership: A Developmental Approach. Pearson Education.
Hallinger, P. (2018). Bringing context out of the shadows of leadership. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 46(1), 5–24. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143216670652
Hargreaves, A., & O’Connor, M. T. (2025). Collaborative Professionalism: When Teaching Together Means Learning for All. Revista Ideales, 20(20), 5–7. https://doi.org/10.59514/2539-5211.3983
Harris, A., & Jones, M. (2019). Teacher leadership and educational change. School Leadership and Management, 39(2), 123–126. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632434.2019.1574964
Harris, A., Jones, M., & Ismail, N. (2025). Teacher Leadership and School/System Change: Exploring the Contemporary Evidence. International Journal of Education Policy and Leadership, 21(3). https://doi.org/10.22230/ijepl.2025v21n3a1589
Hattie, J. (2008). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. In Visible Learning: A Synthesis of Over 800 Meta-Analyses Relating to Achievement. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203887332
Hord, S. M. (1997). Professional Learning Communities: Communities of Continuous. Leadership, 40(1), 58–59.
Kleinsasser, R., Danaher, P., Levine, T., Maclellan, E., Pithouse-morgan, K., Kong, H., Morine-dershimer, G., Dunkin, M. J., Gage, N. L., Gore, J., Butler, D. L., Chen, C., Chesnut, S., Day, C., Flores, M., Gomez, M. L., Huber, J., & Kurz, T. (2022). Editorial Board. Teaching and Teacher Education, 113, 103710. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0742-051x(22)00084-1
Korthagen, F. (2017). Inconvenient truths about teacher learning: Towards professional development 3.0. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 23(4), 387–405. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2016.1211523
Kraft, M. A., Blazar, D., & Hogan, D. (2018a). The Effect of Teacher Coaching on Instruction and Achievement: A Meta-Analysis of the Causal Evidence. Review of Educational Research, 88(4), 547–588. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654318759268
Kraft, M. A., Blazar, D., & Hogan, D. (2018b). The Effect of Teacher Coaching on Instruction and Achievement: A Meta-Analysis of the Causal Evidence. XX(X), 1–42. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654318759268
Kulich, L. S., & Knight, J. (2014). Instructional Coaching Model. 29–55.
Larrivee, B. (2008). Development of a tool to assess teachers’ level of reflective practice. Reflective Practice, 9(3), 341–360. https://doi.org/10.1080/14623940802207451
Leithwood, K., Harris, A., & Hopkins, D. (2020). Seven strong claims about successful school leadership revisited. School Leadership & Management, 40(1), 5–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632434.2019.1596077
Lolowang, Y., Weol, W., & Mamahit, M. M. (2024). Penerapan Supervisi Akademik Berbasis Coaching Pada Guru Pak di SMP Negei 1 Lolak Kabupaten Bolaang Mongondow. Jurnal Ilmiah Wahana …, 10(19), 46–58.
Louis, K., & Stoll, L. (2007). Stoll, L., & Louis, K.S. (Eds.). (2007). Professional learning communities: Divergence, depth and dilemmas. London/New York: Open University Press/McGraw Hill.
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldana, J. (2018). Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook. SAGE Publications.
Minguela, M., & Onrubia, J. (2022). Assisting teacher collaborative discourse in professional development: An analysis of a facilitator ’ s discourse strategies. 113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2022.103667
Moon, A. J. (2006). Learning Journals A handbook for reflective practice and professional development Second edition. 206.
Morse, J. M. (2015). Critical Analysis of Strategies for Determining Rigor in Qualitative Inquiry. Qualitative Health Research, 25(9), 1212–1222. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732315588501
Nolan, James F. and Hoover, L. A. (2011). Teacher Supervision and Evaluation: Theory into Practice. In Teacher Supervision and Evaluation: Theory into Practice.
OECD. (2018a). TALIS 2018 Results: Equity: I.
OECD. (2018b). TALIS 2018 Results: Equity: I.
Opfer, V. D., & Pedder, D. (2011). Conceptualizing teacher professional learning. Review of Educational Research, 81(3), 376–407. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654311413609
Patton, M. Q. (2014). Qualitative Research & Evaluation Methods: Integrating Theory and Practice. SAGE Publications.
Priestley, M., & Drew, V. (2019). Professional enquiry: An ecological approach to developing teacher agency. An Ecosystem for Research-Engaged Schools: Reforming Education through Research, 154–169. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203701027-11
S. B. Merriam and E. J. Tisdell. (2017). Book Review: Qualitative Research: A Guide to Design and Implementation (4th ed.), by S. B. Merriam and E. J. Tisdell. Adult Education Quarterly, 67(1), 71–73. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741713616671930
Schön, D. A. (2017). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action, 1–374. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315237473
Shenton, A. K. (2004). Strategies for ensuring trustworthiness in qualitative research projects. Education for Information, 22(2), 63–75. https://doi.org/10.3233/EFI-2004-22201
Spillane, J. P., Halverson, R., & Diamond, J. B. (2006). Towards a theory of leadership practice: A distributed perspective. Rethinking Schooling: Twenty-Five Years of the Journal of Curriculum Studies, 196–229. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203963180
Stake, R. E. (1995). The Art of Case Study Research. SAGE Publications.
Stoll, L., Bolam, R., McMahon, A., Wallace, M., & Thomas, S. (2006). Professional Learning Communities: A Review of the Literature. Journal of Educational Change, 7(4), 221–258. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-006-0001-8
Timperley, H. (2011). Realising the Power of Professional Learning. Maidenhead. Open University Press.
van Nieuwerburgh, C., Barr, M., Munro, C., Noon, H., & Arifin, D. (2020). Experiences of aspiring school principals receiving coaching as part of a leadership development programme. International Journal of Mentoring and Coaching in Education, 9(3), 291–306. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJMCE-11-2019-0107
Vangrieken, K., Dochy, F., Raes, E., & Kyndt, E. (2015). Teacher collaboration: A systematic review. Educational Research Review, 15, 17–40. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2015.04.002
Vescio, V., Ross, D., & Adams, A. (2008). A review of research on the impact of professional learning communities on teaching practice and student learning. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24(1), 80–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2007.01.004
Walsh, N. R., Ginger, K., & Akhavan, N. (2020). Benefits of instructional coaching for teacher efficacy: A mixed methods study with prek-6 teachers in california. Issues in Educational Research, 30(3), 1143–1161.
Wenner, J. A., & Campbell, T. (2017). The Theoretical and Empirical Basis of Teacher Leadership: A Review of the Literature. Review of Educational Research, 87(1), 134–171. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654316653478
Yin, R. K. (2017). Case Study Research and Applications: Design and Methods. SAGE Publications.
York-Barr, Jennifer, & Duke, Karen. (2004). What Do We Know About Teacher Leadership? Findings From Two Decades of Scholarship. Review of Educational Research, 74(3), 255–316. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543074003255
Yulindar, Aswad, F. H., & Badrun, M. (2025). Implementasi Supervisi Akademik Berbasis Coaching Dalam Meningkatkan Kualitas Pembelajaran Pada Kurikulum Merdeka. Manajemen Pendidikan, 20(1), 187–196.
Zeichner, K. , & L. D. (2014). Reflective Teaching: An Introduction. Routledge.
Zepeda, S. J. (2025). Pengawasan Instruksional Menerapkan Alat dan Konsep.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Kartini Nurhidayah, Diding Nurdin, Nugraha Suharto, Taufani C Kurniatun, Nurdin
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Mendeley
Zotero
Grammarly
Spelling & Grammar
Turnitin 
