Transforming Teacher Performance: Optimizing Learning Through Information and Communication Technology
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31538/ndhq.v9i3.59Keywords:
Information and Communication Technology, Teacher Performance, EducationAbstract
This study aims to explore the effect of information and communication technology (ICT) usage on teacher performance at Madrasah Aliyah in Jember Regency. The background of this research is the low quality of teachers in Indonesia, as indicated by the 2015 Teacher Competency Test (UKG) results, with a national average score of only 44.5, far below the standard of 75. A quantitative method with a descriptive approach was used to collect data from 40 teachers as samples, using a questionnaire that had been tested for validity and reliability. Data analysis employed descriptive statistical analysis, classical assumption tests, and simple linear regression. The research results show that ICT usage has a significant impact on teacher performance, with a regression coefficient value of 0.809, meaning that every 1% increase in ICT usage improves teacher performance by 80.9%. The T-count value of 4.904 is greater than the T-table value of 2.035, with a significance level of 0.000, indicating a significant influence. Additionally, the R-Square value of 0.422 indicates that 42.2% of the variability in teacher performance can be explained by ICT usage, while the remaining 57.8% is influenced by other factors. The study also identifies various digital tools and platforms used by teachers, such as Moodle, Google Classroom, Kahoot!, and Quizlet, which contribute to improved teaching performance. However, the study also notes challenges in ICT implementation, including accessibility, technological skills, and curriculum integration. These findings provide a comprehensive view of how ICT can be effectively utilized in education and the challenges that need to be addressed to maximize its benefits. This study has practical and theoretical implications, including recommendations for the use of technology in teaching and the addition of literature on ICT utilization in education
References
Aivazidi, M., & Michalakelis, C. (2023). Information and Communication Technologies in Primary Education: Teachers’ Perceptions in Greece. Informatics, 10(3), Article 3. https://doi.org/10.3390/informatics10030057
Boone, H., & Boone, D. (2012). Analyzing Likert Data. The Journal of Extension, 50(2). https://doi.org/10.34068/joe.50.02.48
Cen, L., Ruta, D., Powell, L., Hirsch, B., & Ng, J. (2016). Quantitative approach to collaborative learning: Performance prediction, individual assessment, and group composition. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 11(2), 187–225. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-016-9234-6
Chan, C. K. Y., & Lee, K. K. W. (2023). The AI generation gap: Are Gen Z students more interested in adopting generative AI such as ChatGPT in teaching and learning than their Gen X and millennial generation teachers? Smart Learning Environments, 10(1), 60. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-023-00269-3
De Smet, C., Bourgonjon, J., De Wever, B., Schellens, T., & Valcke, M. (2012). Researching instructional use and the technology acceptation of learning management systems by secondary school teachers. Computers & Education, 58(2), 688–696. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.09.013
Fahrizandi, F. (2020). Pemanfaatan Teknologi Informasi di Perpustakaan. Tik Ilmeu : Jurnal Ilmu Perpustakaan Dan Informasi, 4(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.29240/tik.v4i1.1160
Greenier, V., Fathi, J., & Behzadpoor, S.-F. (2023). Teaching for creativity in an EFL context: The predictive roles of school climate, teaching enthusiasm, and metacognition. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 50, 101419. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2023.101419
Harahap, L. P. (2020). Pengaruh Supervisi Kepala Madrasah Dan Kemampuan Penggunaan Teknologi Terhadap Kinerja Guru Man Di Kota Medan. EduTech: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan Dan Ilmu Sosial, 6(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.30596/edutech.v6i1.4389
Hekkert, M. P., Suurs, R. A. A., Negro, S. O., Kuhlmann, S., & Smits, R. E. H. M. (2007). Functions of innovation systems: A new approach for analysing technological change. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 74(4), 413–432. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2006.03.002
Ibrahim, D. S., & Suardiman, S. P. (2014). Pengaruh Penggunaan E-Learning Terhadap Motivasi Dan Prestasi Belajar Matematika Siswa Sd Negeri Tahunan Yogyakarta. Jurnal Prima Edukasia, 2(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.21831/jpe.v2i1.2645
Irasuti, I., & Bachtiar, B. (2024). Empowering Indonesian EFL Teachers: The Transformative Impact of Visual Literacy Training on Teaching Materials. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 23(8), Article 8.
Jonassen, D. H., & Rohrer-Murphy, L. (1999). Activity theory as a framework for designing constructivist learning environments. Educational Technology Research and Development, 47(1), 61–79. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02299477
Kabukcu, C., & Chabal, L. (2021). Sampling and quantitative analysis methods in anthracology from archaeological contexts: Achievements and prospects. Quaternary International, 593–594, 6–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quaint.2020.11.004
Kain, C., Koschmieder, C., Matischek-Jauk, M., & Bergner, S. (2024). Mapping the landscape: A scoping review of 21st century skills literature in secondary education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 151, 104739. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2024.104739
Koswara, K., & Rasto, R. (2016). Kompetensi Dan Kinerja Guru Berdasarkan Sertifikasi Profesi. Jurnal Pendidikan Manajemen Perkantoran, 1, 61. https://doi.org/10.17509/jpm.v1i1.3269
Lao, H. A. E., Ekosiswoyo, R., Sutarto, J., & Pramono, S. E. (2018). The Performance of Teachers in the Digital Era in Improving Learning Quality. 219–223. https://doi.org/10.2991/iset-18.2018.46
Lerche, L. (2012). Quantitative Methods. Elsevier.
Lestari, D. I., & Kurnia, H. (2023). Implementasi Model Pembelajaran Inovatif Untuk Meningkatkan Kompetensi Profesional Guru Di Era Digital. JPG: Jurnal Pendidikan Guru, 4(3), Article 3. https://doi.org/10.32832/jpg.v4i3.14252
Lubis, M., Embi, M., Yunus, M., Wekke, I., & Nordin, N. (2009). The application of multicultural education and applying ICT on Pesantren in South Sulawesi, Indonesia. WSEAS Transactions on Information Science and Applications, 6, 1401–1411.
Milara, I. S., & Orduña, M. C. (2024). Possibilities and challenges of STEAM pedagogies (arXiv:2408.15282). arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2408.15282
Muid, A., Arifin, B., & Karim, A. (2024). Peluang Dan Tantangan Pendidikan Pesantren Di Era Digital (Studi Kasus di Pondok Pesantren Al-Islah Bungah Gresik). MODELING: Jurnal Program Studi PGMI, 11(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.36835/modeling.v11i1.2254
Mumtaz, S. (2000). Factors affecting teachers’ use of information and communications technology: A review of the literature. Journal of Information Technology for Teacher Education, 9(3), 319–342. https://doi.org/10.1080/14759390000200096
Munawir, Khoiriyatin, V. Z., & Rahmawati, A. D. (2024). Pemanfaatan Teknologi Informasi Untuk Meningkatkan Pembelajaran Pendidikan Agama Islam di MI/SD. TEACHING AND LEARNING JOURNAL OF MANDALIKA (TEACHER) e- ISSN 2721-9666, 5(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.36312/teacher.v5i1.2883
Munir, M. (2009). Kurikulum Berbasis Teknologi Informasi dan Komunikasi. Alfabeta, CV. chrome-extension://efaidnbmnnnibpcajpcglclefindmkaj/http://file.upi.edu/Direktori/FPMIPA/PRODI._ILMU_KOMPUTER/196603252001121-MUNIR/BUKU/Kurikulum%20Berbasis%20Teknologi%20Informasi%20dan%20Komunikasi.pdf
Murdaningsih, D. (2019, April 18). Rendahnya Kompetensi Guru Jadi Masalah Pendidikan Indonesia. Republika. https://republika.co.id/berita/pq53k5368/rendahnya-kompetensi-guru-jadi-masalah-pendidikan-indonesia
Özgenel, M., & Mert, P. (2019). The role of teacher performance in school effectiveness. https://doi.org/10.35826/ijetsar.42
Sari, T. N. S. (2021, Desember). Pembelajaran yang Monoton, Sebabkan Siswa Menjadi Bosan dan Malas. UPMK News. https://news.upmk.ac.id/home/post/pembelajaran.yang.monoton.sebabkan.siswa.menjadi.bosan.dan.malas.html
Wardat, Y., Tashtoush, M., Alali, R., & Saleh, S. (2024). Artificial Intelligence in Education: Mathematics Teachers’ Perspectives, Practices and Challenges. Iraqi Journal For Computer Science and Mathematics, 5(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.52866/ijcsm.2024.05.01.004
Yani, Y., Darwis, A., & Riany, Y. E. (2021). Pengaruh Penguasaan Teknologi dan Disiplin Kerja terhadap Kinerja Guru dengan Produktivitas Sebagai Variabel Intervening pada Sekolah XXX. Syntax Idea, 3(6), 1494–1512. https://doi.org/10.46799/syntax-idea.v3i6.1233
Yunus, S. (2017, November 24). Mengkritisi Kompetensi Guru. Detiknews. https://news.detik.com/kolom/d-3741162/mengkritisi-kompetensi-guru
Zenda, R., & Dlamini, R. (2023). Examining factors that influence teachers to adopt information and Communication Technology in rural secondary schools: An empirical study. Education and Information Technologies, 28(1), 815–832. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11198-y
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Endra Priawasana, Pipit Rika Wijaya
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.